Whenever cargo is transported, safety should always be the first priority. While the focus of the last few months has been on the dangers posed by misdeclared container weights, especially overloaded boxes (see our previous post on the new IMO rule on container weight verification), we should never lose sight of the vitally important challenge of making sure that the cargo is safely packed and secured inside the container itself.
This is particularly true for coiled materials, especially those with a high density such as steel. Not only is the cargo itself often easy to damage, but the combination of a heavy weight and a small surface area can be dangerous. If the coils are not properly secured in the container, it can have catastrophic and even fatal consequences.
After a series of incidents, the TT Club – a provider of insurance and related risk management services to the international transport and logistics industry – and the Cargo Incident Notification Scheme – a shipping line initiative aimed at increasing safety in the supply chain – have teamed up to produce a useful briefing on Transport of Coiled Material in Containers.
The briefing is designed to conform with the IMO/ILO/UNECE Code of Practice for Packing Cargo Transport Units and provide additional information. It does a great job of going over the key points that shippers and packers needs to know. There is no point in Intermodal Eye summarising the whole document here, as the Guidelines are short, well-written and extensively illustrated, but here are our key takeaways:
The guidelines explain how to pack in whatever arrangement the packers choose. This requires working out the correct number and location of the bedding beams, which are designed to transfer the cargo mass through the container floor to a greater number of cross members. Next, the packer needs to make sure there is adequate blocking and bracing to prevent movement or tipping. Finally, the coil needs to be secured to the cradle or bedding with adequate lashing. All these steps are shown and extensively illustrated. Finally, some advice is given to help avoid handling damage during loading and unloading.
The guidelines are focused on less sophisticated operations reliant on timber for load distribution and bracing. Other solutions are available such as specialist cradles, cassette-type designs or even bespoke container designs. One such example is the Strang System, which uses expanded polystyrene, and recently made the shortlist of the ICHCA Innovation in Safety Award. The catch when using those kinds of multi-use solutions is making sure you can transport them back again.
What struck Intermodal Eye most clearly when researching this piece was how little this problem had been talked about in public before these guidelines came out. The German shipping line Hapag-Lloyd has produced some information but otherwise there isn’t much information available online. The TT Club and CINS should be applauded for highlighting an under-reported issue and providing an example of how strong inter-industry collaboration can improve safety (though it is up to the packers to follow the guidelines). Let’s hope this provides a model for further partnerships in our industry.
Around 740,000 tank containers transport bulk liquids, powders and gases around the world on a…
ITCO’s Annual Tank Container fleet survey is eagerly awaited by industry watchers as it just…
For a software implementation project to be successful, it needs the total involvement of and…
Eagletainer is a full-service ISO tank container operator headquartered in Singapore. With 11,000 tank containers…
Peacock Container Holding can trace its origins as far back as 1986, a long time…
Much more than track ‘n trace Supply chains for bulk commodity businesses are very different…